Powered By Blogger

Thursday, December 24, 2015

The Broken Cloud - A Commendable Effort


‘Poetry is a sword of lightning, ever unsheathed, which consumes the scabbard that would contain it’, said none other than the famous English poet Percy Bysshe Shelley. ‘Like a glorious conqueror it has, since the creation of the world, received the tribute and admiration in every land – from the savage – the homeless wanderer of the mighty forest-to the son of civilization luxuriating in the midst of refinement’ – wrote the eminent poet and dramatist Michael Madhusudan Dutta in one of his essays regarding poetry. The earliest form of poetry was born through folk songs and the need to retell oral epics. Poetry has since then evolved and transformed through the ages. Aestheticians have identified three major genres: epic poetry, lyric poetry, and dramatic poetry. While the epic and dramatic poetry belong more to the past ages, lyric poetry is the form that has been most abundant in the modern times. This genre, which expresses ones emotions and feelings and constitutes primarily of the personal purview of the poet has perhaps gained more importance in our times because of a massive change in the way of life. They can further be sub divided into sub-genres like prosaic poetry, light poetry, speculative poetry etc. 


Women have made great contributions to poetry throughout the ages – be it Sappho or Christina Rosetti. Poetry by women, especially lyric poetry offers a point of view of life quite different from that of male poets. Leafing through Sridatta Gupta’s poetry compilation titled, ‘The Broken Cloud’ stresses this woman’s point of view to a certain extent. However, many of the poems are of an ambiguous nature and can be applicable for a men as well as women


The compilation begins with a sweet and nostalgic poem ‘Those Days’. This poem emulates the sweet reminiscences of the days spent with the loved one in a refreshing tone, without any hint of melancholy. It stresses the strength in memories and their power to sustain life even after the loved one has departed. The next poem ‘Unpacked Memories’ continues in the same spirit and talks about the pleasant memories of togetherness brought up by the thought of moving from an old abode. The tone shifts in the poem ‘Alive’, which has a distinct echo of feminism. The poet voices a modern woman who is independent, confident and raises her voice against the patriarchal prejudices that demean women. This women’s perspective is also reflected in the poems like ‘She – A Mystery’, which celebrates the unfathomable mystery of being a woman; ‘Domestic Lore’, which voices a homemaker and describes her activity all over the day in a joyous spirit; ‘They Never Came Back’, which is from the point of view of a public woman who recounts the momentary intimacies with her clients and sadly reflects that they were only temporary. There is another interesting set of poems that cater to personifications. The poem ‘I stand Tall’ gives voice to a tree, while ‘Breath of Life’ describes the feelings of an unborn child just before it is going to be born, very scientifically, yet poetically.  Similarly ‘Unheard sobs’ refer to the road or in a larger sense the earth which is tired with the torture of vehicles and human civilization. These poems are in the first person. A slight variant of these are poems like ‘Journey’, which depicts the journey of a river from its point of origin to the sea, in second person, which in a way acts as a metaphor for life itself; ‘Though art superior’, which portrays time as the supreme reality; ‘Counting my blessings’, in which the poet compares herself to a tree that stands all alone on the roadside and realizes that she is much better off, since she has people whom she can share her life with, making it an interesting application of Gandhiji’s talisman.  There is another set of poems that deal with metaphors. For e.g: in the poem ‘Broken Kites’, the flying kites act as a metaphor for dreams. Some of them snap, some get entangled yet some soar to new heights. In ‘Youth’s Sunset’, the progression of morning into evening and eventually night act as metaphors for the different phases of life – youth, middle age and old age. In ‘Grain of Sand’, sand is compared to youth and flying sand to the vitality of life. In the poem ‘Love’s Mekhla’, The poet is fascinated by the skill of craftsmen looming a Mekhla saree and compares the intricate craft of weaving bits and pieces of string to that of building a relationship. There are some poems that are of a very personal nature, and are the fruits of observations and realizations of the poet. ‘I say its unfair’ touches upon the theme of Confucius’s Golden Rule, contemplating the fact that we complain of someone’s bad behavior but do not comprehend the fact that we may have similarly with others. In the poem, ‘Mysteries of Life – An Open book’, the poet recollects her worst fears but realizes that living in fear ends the life before it even begins and resolves to live it to the fullest. There are also poems on varying tones that cannot be categorized as such. Notable among them are ‘A stranger in strangeness’, which celebrates an unnamed relationship with someone who is a friend yet more than a friend, one who shines brightly in the memories of days gone by, which is something many of us can relate to; ‘I do I do’, which expresses the joy of getting into a commitment and the sorrows of it turning sour and thus portrays a harsh reality of our age; ‘Yesterday Night It Rained’, which is a descriptive as well as lyrical poem describing the  sights and sounds of rain that evoke a deep nostalgia. The title poem, ‘The Broken Cloud’ emphasizes the spirit of moving on. The broken cloud represents the attachments to the past which are difficult to get rid of. But once that is accomplished, the wounds are healed giving rise to new hope. This is indeed a good choice for the title of the book. But perhaps the best poem in the collection is ‘Writer’s Block’. This poem depicts the writer’s block and the way she overcomes it. Hence the process of writing the poem becomes the poem itself, making it an interesting application of Poioumena in poetry. Although this has precedents, it is nonetheless praiseworthy. This poem can also be thought of an example of Immanuel Kant’s ‘Ding an Sich’, or the ‘thing-in-itself’.



The poems are mostly of a lyrical nature. Some of the verses rhyme, while some are in free verse. However the rhyme or lack of it seems to be very much in tune with the mood of each poem. The choice of words is also apt. The arrangement order of the poems is thoughtful. The illustrations by Sukhada Sahasrabuddhe perfectly compliment the poetry.



Overall ‘The Broken Cloud’ is a commendable effort by debutante poet Sridatta. I wish her all the best for her future endeavors.




Wednesday, March 11, 2015

Om Dar Ba Dar : A Pioneer in Indian Avant – Garde



 “Forget Bunuel, Jodorowsky or Warhol for a while! If there’s a single Indian film that draws you towards mind-blowing realm of post modernist…absurdist…surrealist blast to the senses, here’s the cult made by Kamal Swaroop.” This had been the reaction of one of my facebook friends(Hiren Dave), after watching Om Dar Ba Dar. This is considered to be a groundbreaking film in Indian cinema, pertaining to the avant-garde genre.
The term avant-garde film refers to the genre of innovative and experimental cinema. Avant-garde as a film movement started in Europe in the early 20’s notably among filmmakers like Rene Clair, Man Ray, Duchamp etc. In 1929 film auteur Luis Bunuel in collaboration with artist Salvador Dali created a short film ‘Un Chien Andalou’, that would become a benchmark for avant-garde films all over the world. The genre gradually spread to other parts of the world and resulted in various flavors of experimental filming. This was possible because avant-garde did not restrain itself to any particular format, rather opened up a boundless arena for experimentation on celluloid.
India did not lag far behind. Though avant-garde did not emerge as a major movement during the Indian New Wave, there have been attempts at experimental cinema since 1969(Uday Shankar’s ‘Kalpana’(1948) did contain elements of avant-garde, however, it is debatable whether it could be called a full fledged avant-garde film). However the first feature length film that could be classified as avant-garde (though not necessarily synchronous with the avant-garde movement) came in 1988 from the hands of an auteur known as Kamal Swaroop. ‘Om Dar Ba Dar’, was also the first avant-garde film to get national and international recognition and is still widely viewed and discussed among film enthusiasts.
Kamal Swaroop, a 1974 graduate from FTII Pune had previously worked on a collaboration project, ‘Ghasiram Kotwal’(1976) with the likes of Mani Kaul and also assisted Richard Attenborough during filming of Gandhi’(1982). ‘Om Dar Ba Dar’ was his first solo film. Its release was preceded by a huge controversy in the censor board. However, it won Filmfare Critics Award for the Best Film in 1989. Today, after 20 years of its release, this film has attained a cult status

Kamal Swaroop
 The film is a satirical representation of Indian life as a whole. However, this statement fails to give any insight into the film that is absurdist to the core. It eludes conventional narrative structure in general and comprises of a series of psychedelic and non-linear imagery that does not attempt to make sense on a whole. It rather comes across as a deconstruction of collective meaning.
At this point, I would try to give a brief overview of what distantly resembles a plot for the film. Om(Manish Gupta/Aditya Lakhiya) lives in Ajmer. His father Veer Shankar(Lakshminarayan Shastri), who is referred throughout the film as Babuji, is a retired government employee cum astrologer. After Om was born, Babuji discovered that he was destined to die at the age of 18 years, from his horoscope. He named the newborn child Om in an attempt to evade the agents of death, since he believed that the sound of ‘Om’ has never been heard in the jamalok. Om’s elder sister Gayatri(Gopi Desai) considers herself equal in stature to men and sits in men’s section of theatre to emphasize this. Jagdish(Lalit Tiwari), a young man shifts to Ajmer from Jhumritalaiya. He falls for Gayatri when he spots her bold demeanor in the cinema hall. He is further elated to discover that he and Gayatri have been requesting the same song on radio for years. Om meanwhile gains popularity in school due to his ability to hold breath underwater for a long time. Babuji buys Gayatri a bicycle. Jagdish takes the task of teaching her how to ride it. They come closer. Om celebrates a friend’s birthday at a terrace on the same night that Neil Armstrong and his crew land on the moon.
As days pass, we see Babuji setting up an astrology centre in his home and Jagdish becoming his typist. Gayatri also helps Babuji in receiving clients and carrying out the business.



Om has grown into a teenager. He is interested in science as well as mystics and occult and has a fascination for frogs. A lady named Phoolkumari(Anita Kanwar) arrives to consult Babuji. Since she is unable to pay them money, Babuji and Gayatri decide to appoint her as a typist, citing that Jagdish’s spelling is bad. This enrages Jagdish and he breaks off contact with them.
Om is in an adolescent phase and is attracted to Phoolkumari. Lala Lotamal, a businessman on fearing an approaching war; hides his diamonds in the soles of a pair of his shoes and gives it to Babuji for safekeeping.



 Meanwhile, Jagdish visits Gayatri. She compels him to get involved physically with her. One day, Om runs off wearing the shoes with diamonds, unknowingly. Babuji suspects Phool and she puts a curse on him which would make him unable to leave his room forever. Om arrives at Lotamal’s private land where some of the diamonds fall off and are swallowed by frogs. When Lala Lotamal comes to claim the diamonds, Babuji convinces him that he has crushed the diamonds and mixed it in the food he is being served. He also instructs Lalaji to hold his bowels for fifteen days and defecate in his land on the night of full moon in order to sow an unlimited supply of diamonds. He also warns him that if anyone sees him in the process, that person should not see anyone else till morning. Lalaji goes to his own land on full moon night in order to comply. Om spots him in the act. Lalaji remembers Babuji’s advice and appoints Om as the guardian of his land. Om starts supplying frogs to a local girls’ school for biology practical lessons.

When these frogs are dissected in the Biology class, the girls discover diamonds in them. The word spreads and leads to a frog-hunt on Lalaji’s land by a mob, in search of diamonds. Though the diamonds have actually fallen off from Om’s shoes, Lalaji believes that they have come from his feces. Lalaji tries to stop this and is shot.

 
When Om returns home, Babuji tries to catch him. In the process he crosses the verandah and dies due to Phool’s curse. Om arrives at Pushkar. A local Brahmin discovers his ability to hold breath underwater and plans to utilize it for moneymaking. Since the time of Pushkar festival is approaching, he convinces Om to do his breath holding trick every night at 12. This brings a mass of pilgrims to the lake every night. The media also get interested in this event and various brands use Om to promote their products. The people are inspired by Om’s feats and decide to hold their breath along with him as a movement. Om’s discussion with his friend leads him to believe that since his nature is to hold breath, he should breathe once in order to participate in the peoples’ movement(A Saans a ra andolan). He dies underwater when he tries to breathe and his dead body floats up.
Jagdish comes to visit Gayatri after a long time and finds that she has given birth to a child(presumably a result of their lovemaking). He pleads for forgiveness and Gayatri finally obliges. In the end they contemplate suicide by taking potassium cyanide(KCN) and plan to let the world know about its taste. Jagdish takes it first and instructs Gayatri to take down the taste of KCN, since he is weak at spelling. He utters “Gobar”(implying that KCN tastes like cow dung)  before dying. Gayatri changes her mind, abandons the suicide plan and returns home in a bike.


Though the above summary seems logical and linear, the actual treatment is far from it. Many parts of the plot come in reverse and juxtaposed sequences with respect to time. For instance the event of Om arriving at Pushkar is shown before he meets Lotamal in his land. Also the sequence of Lalaji coming to console Gayatri after his father’s death is shown after the sequence of him being shot dead during the frog-hunt. However, such non-linearity is perhaps the least of befuddling elements in the movie.
As mentioned before, the film does not have a collective meaning, a fact that aligns it with the principles of absurdism (human beings’ inability to comprehend an absolute meaning in the universe). However, characteristics or symbolisms can be discerned if we look at the movie in parts. Indeed, the film contains a myriad of varying themes and traits referenced at multiple junctures in the narrative/anti-narrative.
My attempt would be to enumerate some such key elements of this unique film:

  • Examples of non sequitur logic(e.g: all a’s are b’s) are strewn throughout the movie. One example that comes to my mind is towards the beginning, when Gayatri asks Om, “Tujhe kaise pata barish hone wali hai ?”(How do you know it is going to rain?) and Om replies “Tu Kangi jo kar rahi hai”(Because you are combing your hair). Many of the dialogs in the film follow this pattern. Besides this, many of the dialogs are deliberately incoherent and incongruous to produce a nonsensical effect.
  • Another central theme of the movie is the effortless intertwining of science, religion and superstition in Indian life. When Gayatri asks, “Kya koi ladki ladke ke bina Everest chad sakti hai?”(Can any woman climb the Everest without the help of a man?); Jagdish replies, “Parvati ji Chadi Thi”(Godess Parvati did). Again when Gayatri says, “Suna hai chand pe nani ka post khali hai”(I’ve heard that the post of the old lady on moon is vacant), Jagdish in turn asks, “Tum kat leti ho?”(Can you sew?) . The chand ki nani is referenced again on the day when man lands on the moon. Amidst the celebration on the terrace, we see a woman with white hair smiling just when the time of the moon landing arrives.These aspects may seem to be abstract amalgamations, however if we think how science, religion and superstition serve as driving factors for an average Indian citizen, this treatment assumes a very significant relevance.
  •  Gayatri’s part in the movie is perhaps the only linear aspect in the whole film and integrity can be found between the fragments of the narrative relating to her. This is perhaps because views on women’s liberation come through her. She considers herself equal to men and sits in the men’s section of movie theaters, rides a bicycle etc to prove it. In one sequence, she asks Jagdish to make love to her. When Jagdish fumbles with the strings of his underwear, it is Gayatri who brings the scissors and cuts the string. Their lovemaking is portrayed through a humorous metaphor. We see Babuji calling out Gayatri’s name and cycling to and fro in front of their house. Here Babuji is physically not present, rather is a symbolism for the patriarchal inhibition, seemingly for protecting a woman’s virtue before marriage. Babuji collapsing with the cycle signifies the event of Gayatri’s capsizing this inhibition.
  • The scenario of a woman asking for sex rather than succumbing to a man’s desire was seldom seen in the cinema of that time. This is one of the aspects among others, which illustrates that Kamal Swaroop’s masterpiece was much ahead of its times. The director has maintained an egalitarian outlook throughout the movie. Thus, Gayatri gives birth to a child without marriage and raises her alone. Towards the end Jagdish takes Gayatri along to the edge of a cliff in the attempt to commit suicide by tasting KCN. He mentions about udna or flying together. However, we witness, only Jagdish taking KCN and dying. Gayatri changes her mind and returns on a scooter, as a strong departure from Bollywood love stories depicting the hero and heroine dying together. Here the flying becomes a double ended metaphor, one for suicide and the other for Gayatri’s liberation.
  • The sequences involving Om comprise of the most bizarre and abstract imagery in the whole film, be it the dream sequence hinting at his fear of examination (biology), or the ‘Rana Tigrina‘ song. Om’s fetish with frogs is evident from the sequence of this song ending with Om supposedly gripping the picture of an attractive woman and the sequence where a dead frog is referred to as ‘ladki ki laash’(Corpse of a lady). This could be a subtle hint towards zoophile tendencies. Om’s comment about his growing nose obstructing his view(“Jab bhi mai padta hun, naak akshar kha jaate hai”) and the fact of his nose bleeding, is an indicator of the fact that Om has grown up, reached an adolescent age. Phoolkumari puts her black glasses on his eyes, which she claims would enable him to read properly.
  • These simplistic scenarios in my opinion represent Om’s adolescent craving and the sexual undercurrents between Phool and Om. Interestingly, these are not represented through Freudian symbolisms, which is generally a favorite of filmmakers. The director rather conjures up an assemblage of unique metaphors for this and many other instances in the movie.
  • The Pushkar Lake, that plays a significant part in the movie is a place of immense religious importance for the Hindus. In the texts of Padmapurana, it has been described as the place where Brahma had once held a jagna. Consequently, this is the only place to have a temple dedicated to Lord Brahma. It is believed that people who take a dip in the Pushkar during the time of Karthik Shukra Paksha(Full Moon), supposed to be the time of the year corresponding with Brahma’s jagna, wash away their sins and open the gates of heaven in their afterlives. The opening of the Pushkar festival is declared through the statement “Swarg dharti par utar chuka hai”(The heavens have descended to earth) delivered in an airlines announcement-like tone. It is during this time that Om’s magical feat in the Pushkar is put up as a moneymaking prospect for the local Brahmin. The reference of the ‘Promise’ toothpaste(a brand which was available back then) stresses the use of religious platforms for advertising. The use of God as a brand is equally relevant in our times.
  •  Songs have been an integral part of any Indian movie, since inception. The avant-garde songs of ‘Om Dar Ba Dar’ play a very important part in this avant-garde movie as well. The song played on radio is an attempt towards nonsense verse. The song ‘Meri Jaan AAA’ is partly in English, illustrating the English speaking tendencies of the youth and is  a reflection of urban men’s outlook toward women in the then India. ‘Rana Tigrina’ depicts the adolescence of Om and his fascination with frogs.  The lyrics by Kuku and the music by Rajat Dholakia are very appropriate.

One could go on an on writing about this movie; there is so much to write and so much yet to discover. Every time I watch this movie, I find an unexplored nook, a new aspect which I had previously overlooked. Even after all these years, Kamalji gets emails, messages and posts in facebook(he is active in facebook, by the way) from fans of this movie and he is very earnest in replying back to them and discussing about his movie. I was fortunate to have interacted with him on facebook and resolved various doubts about ‘Om Dar Ba Dar’. There are a considerable number of people, who want this movie to be remastered and released with English subtitles. However, when I mentioned this to Kamalji, his reply was, “Too late. I am too tired by this film. I like to move on.” However, the ardent lovers of the film will keep on expecting.
We have had very few examples of feature length avant-garde films in the arena of world cinema. The prominent ones among them were made mostly by Alejandro Jodorowsky. Even considering those, ‘Om Dar Ba Dar’ is unique and Indian to the core. Kamalji does not like to call it an avant-garde film however. In his opinion, “Avant-garde is a technical term applied to a different movement. In Om Dar Ba Dar, I was reacting to the parallel cinema of that time.” He acknowledges Surrealist and Dadaist influences in it. It is certain that if someday, an Indian film theory is developed; this cult classic will receive a special mention as a pioneer in Indian avant-garde, a very deserving accolade for this film and for its creator.

P.S : A digitally restored an subtitled version of this film was released by PVR Cinemas on January 17, 2014, in the metro cities. This release was met with an significant response among film lovers 
References:

1. http://artviewblog.wordpress.com/2011/11/17/kamal-swaroops-interview/


 This article was first published in movie site Madaboutmoviez
http://madaboutmoviez.com/2012/07/08/dar-b-dar-pioneer-indian-avant-garde/

Friday, July 27, 2012

Animal Farm – An Allegorical Satire on Stalinism



All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others”. This is one of the principal allegories for criticizing Stalinism, used in 1954 animated film ‘Animal Farm’. Based on George Orwell’s masterpiece in literature, this film excels in the portrayal of his satire on Joseph Stalin’s rule in USSR, in spite of a number of deviations from the book. This is also Britain's first animated feature film to be officially released.
The film begins with the arrival of spring in Manor Farm. The animals are not happy under the oppression of Mr. Jones, the owner. As discontent grows, one night, Major, an old prize boar assembles all the animals and encourages them to revolt against Jones and establish a system with equality, compassion and justice. 


He imbibes the principles of animalism in them and teaches them the song ‘Beasts of England’, which speaks of the liberation of animals, but drops dead in mid song.
The next morning, Jones forgets to give breakfast to the animals. The animals under leadership of a pig named Snowball, break into the storehouse in search of food. Meanwhile Jones wakes up and tries to intimidate them with a whip. The animals get infuriated and drive him away from the farm. Jones comes back with some other farmers, but the animals, once again led by Snowball, manage to defeat them. Thus the long awaited revolution finally succeeds. 


 The animals change the name of ‘Manor Farm’ to ‘Animal Farm’, accept Snowball as their leader, formulate the seven commandments of Animalism as per Major’s principles and paint them on a barn wall. They are:
  • Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.
  • Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
  • No animal shall wear clothes.
  • No animal shall sleep in a bed.
  • No animal shall drink alcohol.
  • No animal shall kill any other animal.
  • All animals are equal.
They set out to remove all traces of Jones from the farm. In the process, a sly pig named Napoleon stumbles upon Jones’s material possessions and a litter of puppies left motherless. He secretly takes away these puppies with him.
As the days progress, Snowball tries to educate the animals and devises programs for the betterment of the farm. Napoleon meanwhile makes other schemes and gains allies among other opportunist pigs. When snowball proposes a new plan, Napoleon opposes him and drives him away using his goon squad of dogs, now fully grown and ferocious. The dogs catch hold of him and kill him brutally. Napoleon convinces the animals that Snowball is a traitor and had been planning to bring Jones back. The animals, terrorized by such a possibility acquiesce to accept Napoleon as their leader. 


 Napoleon then proclaims Snowball’s idea of a windmill as his own and gives orders for its construction. Boxer, a workhorse along with his friend Benjamin, a donkey and other animals put in a lot of labor to finish the windmill.
Things start changing in the farm. The pigs enjoy special privileges, good food, beds to sleep and start drinking alcohol from Jones’s leftover supply, while the burden of work on other animals increase. Napoleon uses a pig named Squealer as his spokesperson to brainwash the animals into believing that they are better under Napoleon’s rule than they were under Jones’s and also to make additions to the commandments secretly, in the dark of the night.  Two of the commandments are thus changed to suit the pigs as:
  • No animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets
  • No animal shall drink alcohol to excess
Mr Whymper, a local trader eventually enters into a deal with Napoleon. He starts supplying them with jams and jellies in exchange for hen’s eggs. When the hens protest by throwing their eggs at the pigs, Napoleon names them traitors and hands then over to his goon squad, who slaughter them.  Thus another commandment is changed as:
  • No animal shall kill any other animal without cause
Napoleon also bans the song ‘Beasts of England’, citing that its relevance has ended since the dream of animal farm has been materialized.
Animal Farm’s trade with the outside world flourishes. Embittered by this success, Jones along with some other farmers once again attempt to take over the farm. Though they are defeated, Jones succeeds in blasting the windmill, striking a great blow to the farm. A disheartened Boxer takes up the task of rebuilding the windmill, but with his failing health, collapses beside it one night. Napoleon sends a carriage in the pretext of taking him to a hospital. Benjamin notices that the van belongs to Mr. Whymper's glue factory, where Boxer is likely to be poached and attempts to mount a rescue, but fails. Squealer delivers a phony speech, claiming to have been at Boxer's side at his deathbed, and his last words being to glorify Napoleon. The animals finally realize how they are being cruelly exploited by Napoleon.


As years pass, the pigs start wearing clothes and walking on two legs. One day, pig delegates from afar come to visit them. Around this time, Benjamin notices that the seven commandments have been finally reduced to one phrase:
·         All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others
This aggravates the animals everywhere. They gather in the animal farm, revolt against Napoleon under the leadership of Benjamin and manage to overthrow his regime. The film ends with a portrait of Napoleon being smashed and an indication that he is being beaten to death by the animals.
It would be helpful at this point to list down the relationship of the characters and events in the film with the actual characters and events in history:
  • Old Major is the counterpart for Lenin, while Snowball is for Trotsky and Napoleon for Stalin. Boxer is a metaphor for the proletariat or the working class.

  • Jones’s oppression is a symbolism for the Tzar rule in Russia, while the animals overthrowing Jones is a metaphor for the Bolshevik revolution

  • The allegory correctly represents Lenin as the driving force of the 1917 revolution. (Though he was alive, after it happened) Trotsky apart from being the first leader of the Red Army, was also a Marxist revolutionary and theorist. He rose in power after the revolution and became a member of the first politburo. However, during Stalin’s rule, he was expelled from the communist party, driven out of Russia and executed on Stalin’s orders. This is perfectly paralleled in the allegory of Napoleon driving Snowball out of the farm and killing him. Napoleon’s use of dog goon squad for slaughtering animals, that defy him, is a reference to the mass executions that were brought about by Stalin.

  • Animalism is a metaphor for Communism, a practice of the theories of Socialism and Marxism that was implemented by Lenin after U.S.S.R came into existence. The violation of these principles during Stalin’s rule is reflected in the modification of the commandments to suit the pigs, on Napoleons orders.

  • The establishment of trade between Animal Farm and Mr. Whymper is, in my opinion a reference to the 1939 non-aggression pact between U.S.S.R and Nazi Germany (Stalin and Hitler). The animals were shocked by Napoleon’s dealing with a representative of humans, after they had revolted against the tyranny of another representative of the same race (Jones). Indeed, the world had been shocked by this treaty between the extreme left and the extreme right wing political entities.

  • The second attack on the farm by Jones and other farmers is a symbolism for Hitler’s invasion of U.S.S.R in 1941, a crucial event in the history of World War II. U.S.S.R was heavily affected by the war in spite of being on the winning side. The blasting of the windmill is perhaps a reference to this fact.

There are differences and improvisations in the film as compared to the book. The major one among them is in the ending, which is quite apt in my opinion. While the book ends in a melancholy tone, with the animals rendered helpless, the film ends with the animals revolting against Napoleon. This was quite a foresight, since Stalinism did come to an end in U.S.S.R, though not in the same way as portrayed in the allegory.
For an animation made in 1954, the film is surprisingly well made in terms of technique. Though it banks upon the potential of Orwell’s book, directors John Halas and Joy Batchelor, the creative team and the animation director John F Reed deserve equal credit for their adaptation. The treatment, the dialogs, the expressions put on the cartoon animals and humans, the meticulously conceived scenes of the animals working and the spontaneous flow of the film's narrative hand in hand with the theme are brilliant. Special mention must be made of Matyas Seiber, for his music. Maurice Denham’s ventriloquist talents are commendable. He single handedly gives voice to all the animal and human characters in the movie.
The storyline, though intended as a satire on Stalinism, goes beyond the confines of a particular period in history and establishes a fundamental truth of the human society; ‘Even if the oppressed come to power, they eventually become the oppressors’. This has been proved right innumerable times in history. Thus, the appeal of this film is timeless.

Note: This article was first published in Silhouette Magazine Volume 10-1. The link is:

References and Further Reading:



Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Obscure Surrealist Classic – Un Soir Un Train




Lovers of surrealist cinema are acquainted mostly with the names of Bunuel, Tarkovsky and at the most that of Cocteau and Has. However few people can profess to have heard the name of Andre Delvaux(1926 – 2002), a celebrated Belgian filmmaker, in this regard. I had the opportunity to watch his 1968 film ‘Un Soir Un Train’(A Night in the Train), based on Johan Daisne's book ‘De trein der traagheid’ and was enthralled by the subtlety of the narration, the use of multilayered metaphors and the beautiful intertwining of dreams and reality adding to the aspect of ambiguity in the movie. It is a very demanding film and requires multiple viewing to make sense out of it. A brief synopsis of the film is as follows.

Mathias(Yves Montand) is professor of linguistics in a Belgian university, at a time when Belgium is plagued by Walloon movements. He is a writer of Flemish plays as well and is morally opposed to the cause of Walloons.  Although middle-aged, he is unmarried, but has a mistress, Anne(Anouk Aimée), who is a Frenchwoman, working as a costume designer for a theatre. It is revealed that she is currently working on the production of Mathias’s play ‘Elkerlyc’. Their relationship looks as if it may be coming to an end. Anne feels alienated in her Flemish surroundings and is also further aggravated by the fact that Mathias shows no inclination to formalize their relationship.  After a passionless dinner together, Mathias and Anne board a bus which would take them to the railway 

                 


station, since Mathias needs to catch a train to a town where he is to give a lecture. Anne wants to accompany him on the train, but Mathias is uncomfortable about introducing her in his circle. This sparks a heated debate among them. After alighting from the bus, Anne resolves to break off their relationship and declares that she would be leaving Mathias forever.


 However, on the train, Mathias is delighted to see Anne enter his compartment, in spite of his initial reservations about Anne accompanying him.  The couple find themselves incapable of speaking to each other and Mathias falls asleep. He has a series of dreams. Through multiple jump cuts, we are shown a flashback of the couple’s tour of England, the previous year, Mathias watching Anne stand by the window of the train, a scene in the woods and finally overlapping images of a train accident and Mathias and Anne lying beside each other. Mathias awakes from this dream to find his train has stopped and Anne has vanished.  When he leaves the train to investigate along with an old colleague Professor Hernhutter(Hector Camerlynck) and an ex-student Val(François Beukelaers) , the train continues on its way, leaving Mathias and the other two men stranded in the open countryside.  Under nightfall, the three men make their way to a nearby village which is strangely silent. Throughout the journey, Mathias recounts the circumstances under which he had met Anne. When they finally meet the locals, Mathias and the others are unable to recognize their language. They go to a nearby restaurant and are served food by a beautiful waitress whose name is later revealed to be Moira(Adriana Bogdan). The band stars playing a tune and Moira tries to engage them in the dance. Val succumbs in spite of Mathias’s warning. After the dance gets over Mathias is unable to find either professor Hernhutter or Val. He confronts the waitress and suddenly goes into a fit.
                                   
                                            


The scene jump cuts to the site of the train accident and Mathias wakes up from the fit. He finds the lifeless body of Anne in the barn along with Val and breaks into tears.

The acting in the movie is top grade, especially in the roles played by Yves Montand and Anouk Aimée(she appears in quite a contrasting avatar compared to her role in Fellini’s ‘Eight and Half’). The music by Frédéric Devreese blends perfectly with the enigmatic tone of the film. The treatment by Andre Delvaux is very effective, with a straightforward narrative towards the beginning, intended to disarm the viewers and make them unprepared for the non-linear imagery that follows in the latter part of the movie. Let us now look at the film from an analytical angle.

A principal theme of the movie is the linguistic barrier between the Flemish Belgians and the Walloons (French speaking Belgians), which has a long history in Belgium. The relationship between Mathias and Anne becomes a metaphor for this linguistic barrier. The fact that they are unable to speak on the train is a further hint of this situation. However as the synopsis reveals, the latter part of the movie is exceedingly complex since it becomes difficult to gauge the transitions between dream and reality. On closer speculation, multiple interpretations spring up, imparting an ambiguous nature to the film.
On first viewing, it seems that the scene of the train accident shown earlier is not part of a dream, rather a real event demarcating Mathias’s first dream from his second. Mathias passes out due to the accident and dreams of the two other people, the village and his experiences out there.

However, on repeated viewing, several aspects take on new proportions and hint towards other possible interpretations. Early in the movie, the actors enacting Mathias’s play hold a discourse about the appearance of death. They debate whether death should be represented in the traditional getup according to middle age texts or should be inconspicuous (As Werner(Domien De Gruyter) puts it, “In Mathias’s adaptation, death is among thousand other things which could occur”). This discussion becomes relevant if we concentrate on the following facts.
Firstly, the name of the waitress is Moira, which literally means fate. Secondly, when Mathias warns Val about dancing with her and says, “You don’t know what game she is playing”,

      


Val replies, “Her name is Moira. I understand her language. It’s a miracle”. Later Mathias finds Val’s corpse along with that of Anne’s.  These observations hint that Moira could be the personification of fate or death (indistinguishable from any normal person unlike the death in Bergman’s ‘The Seventh Seal’). According to this interpretation, the village can be thought of as a transition state between life and death. Hence, the language barrier between Mathias and the villagers act as a double metaphor, one being the symbolism for the linguistic barrier between the Flemish and the Walloons and the other being the barrier between life and death. Val understands Moira’s language when he submits to her, thereby crossing the barrier. Mathias escapes her and comes back to life from this near death experience.

Yet another possible interpretation could be considering the whole sequence of events after Mathias getting on the train as a series of multilayered dreams (in the same lines as ‘Inception’), from which he does not wake up within the span of the movie. Though this interpretation is a bit ambitious, certain facts like the entry of Anne into the compartment in spite of their previous heated argument and the two of them being unable to communicate, somewhat supports this conclusion. Moreover, the final sequence of Mathias breaking down into tears beside Anne’s corpse is reminiscent of the image of the two of them lying beside each other, which was a part of the first(in this case the first level of) dream, which is also suggestive of the above interpretation. According to this interpretation, flashback of the England tour, the other overlapping imagery and the train accident are part of the first level of dream. Mathias relapses into a second level of dream where his interactions with the other two people and the experiences in the village take place. On waking up from this second level of dream, he moves back to the first level where he confronts the death of Anne and Val as a continuation of the train accident. Mathias’s subconscious is troubled by his treatment of Anne, the fact of their breakup and fabricates the event of Anne’s death as an instrument of rebuke.

       

  
It is difficult to say if Delvaux wanted stress on any single interpretation. It is more likely that he wanted to keep the film open-ended, which follows from the fact that he had given equal hints for each of the possible interpretations. Therefore, it would be unfair to impose any specific interpretation on this movie which aspires to remain ambiguous. This gem of a movie showcases Delvaux’s mastery in every aspect of his craft. It is immensely rewarding for people who enjoy surrealist, enigmatic, ambiguous and intellectually satiating cinema.

References and Further Reading:
  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andre_Delvaux
  2. http://filmsdefrance.com/FDF_Un_soir_un_train_rev.html
  3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walloon_movement
  4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waloons  
Note: This article was first published in Volume 9-4 of Silhouette e-magazine.  
           The link is as follows: